"In a brief but telling statement from Laal Hethri spokesdemon Colonel Shuvra Ouroboros Melmikan the Hellac lead criminal investigation agency has determined Luis Ruiz and Jim Massey both in custody in Oklahoma were responsible for the death and decapitations of Carina Saunders, 19, last year in Bethany, Oklahoma. "This office, after more than a year of information gathering both here in Dis and in Oklahoma, has come to the conclusion that Ruiz and Massey did cause the death of Carina Saunders by means of brutal torture. The Laal Hethri have taken note of all the information offered to this office via many sources which were close to this terrestrial investigation including the scores of entreaties offered by Ms Stacy Privett advocating on behalf of Mr Ruiz. The facts of the case, however, and the eyewitness testimony do bear out that Ms Privett is incorrect in her assessment of Mr Ruiz and that he is certainly the person who caused the death of Carina Saunders." Stacy Privett, who was arrested fleeing the Cleveland County Courthouse on 1 April 2010 when a warrant for her arrest was made known to her, has made several comments here at The Dis Brimstone-Daily Pitchfork regarding her personal knowledge of Luis Ruiz's innocence. None of those lines of inquiry lead to any new information that would absolve Ruiz in the eyes of the Laal Hethri investigation team. Melmikan continued, "This office often sees people who see only one side of a person and not their darker self. The Director would beseech anyone with information on this case to step forward to the proper law enforcement agencies and would ask Ms Privett to go on with her life."
Qu'ul cuda praedex nihil!
Colonel Shuvra Qoboros Melmikan, O.B.R.E., O.Q.H. [Tort.], D.S.V.J.
Public Affairs Officer
Special Branch
6th Urine Dowsing Division
Butcher's Garden
65 Low Lux Negro 2 AS
Let me tell you about a case I worked on because back then I was too messed up with not believing that there could be such a thing as police conspiracies. When I wrote what i wrote on the internet it was solely because I knew that arrest was wrongly done & somehow I felt like I needed to speak up.
ReplyDeleteIn the Luis Ruiz case the system falsified the evidence that they blasted all over T.V. announcing that they had. This was to show the public they had a reason for that arrest & if you make people believe it then you can usually get away with it . !. They knew that it was fake & at one point i know this led all the way up to the District Attorney office & David Prater himself.. who even signed those papers & gave them that warrent for arrest knowing these facts.
During this case does anyone remember the story i had written in "'before the news'".? The one titled "Investigate this" & it shares the fact that on that date that girl was killed that Luis Ruiz was incarcerated & that the reason i knew of this was.., because i had actually learnt that from the Bethany officers themselves before they arrested Luis for that murder.".
In that case I had learnt that the reason it goes from one place the girl killed., to another place the girl was supposedly killed at., is because the cops were raiding houses & busting them without warrents by using that case for the reason they were able to so. (Because they have to make it look good to the public). Whoever thinks just because its on the news then its true, is stupid,.
At one point I knew that everyone knew these facts listed on that arrest warrent were fake & there was none of those things they stated they had, but yet they were not letting him out of jail.. Luis told me that they told him that they could not let him out until after elections. Come to find out that David Prater at that moment was fighting a case they called the tea party event & it included Luis Ruiz's lawyer, David Chance,.. I guess they needed this case to help that & I guess everything the government does is really for elections.
When they arrested someone for that murder they stated there was evidence which was not there & that warrent was still signed by our District Attorney David Prater. In order for David Prater to save his ass they fired those 2 police officers but I am sure they get paid leave. Because thats how the government works. Its all politics.
The government & the news is about manipulating the public for thier own power & they keep themselves up but also keep the lower class down. This is what that causes.
John brewer - Prosecuter on case.
ReplyDeleteJudge Hammond - County Judge
They tried to get him with Trafficking all because it weighed 23 grams with the container. There was not one thing as far as scales, or baggies, or anything besides it being a personal bag.
(Under the federal sentencing guidelines, a "drug trafficking offense" as "an offense under federal, state, or local law that prohibits the manufacture, import, export, distribution, or dispensing of a controlled substance (or a counterfeit substance) or the possession of a controlled substance (or a counterfeit substance) with intent to manufacture, import, export, distribute, or dispense." U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1),)
It was not transporting, or on a highway traveling. He was not making a sale & it was not hidden in a vehicle or animate object for concealing it. It was in his pocket & he was shopping at a store.
(The federal government typically treats trafficking as trafficking, and possession as possession no matter what the amount, but they do give a little leeway for each state to come up with their own guidelines. Although the definition of trafficking is commercial dealing or over state lines.)
So Oklahoma says that over 20 grams can be considered trafficking. But while in jail on a trafficking charge for having 23 grams of Meth in a single bag, he had 2 cell mates who were locked up for possession charges of a misdemeaner with one man carrying 25 grams of meth & he also had a few ounces of Herion with scales & bags. And the other having 28 grams of meth with other baggies.., but yet those 2 men were booked in for possession only.
(Prison reformers seem most unhappy about what they say is a trend of upgrading charges against nonviolent offenders. With our loose definitions many can find a way around question 780. The report notes that while admissions with a controlling drug offense declined, charges for possession with intent to distribute, drug trafficking, child endangerment and second-degree burglary increased.)
He had recently been released from prison so I was thinking that meant he had been clean so it was odd to me that he smoked as much as he did. But then I learnt it was widely common in prison & he was released having a habit like that. Guess it more common to pick up that habit there than on the outs & from what i understand its even easier to come across & more widely used.
What else is there to pass a prison sentence of solitude by with drugs.. ? Its a proven fact that solitude, at any portion that is great, causes insanity & that most people with mental disabilities use drugs. And that it is common place for someone to become insane after being locked in a room & isolated for years.
And since Richard Urrutia has been released this time I can definitely see signs of schizophrenia. He spent many years in prison for rather small things. Like he grabbed a toolbox out of the back of truck once & that got him a 10 years. That is rather obssessive amount of a human life to be locked away for a toolbox.!
There should be a basic law for the nation & the government should not alter it for each person or the next.
BECAUSE THIS STATE IS NOT GIVING SOMEONE A CHANCE. AND I HAVE WITNESSED MANY FLAWS OVER THE YEARS IN OUR SYSTEM & OUR GOVERNMENT.
Stacy Privett
They offered Richard Urrutia 15 years on what is really just a possession charge. Who are they to say someone should spend 15 years of thier life locked away for doing drugs. He ain't hurting anybody & he works all the time. He does not take part in other criminal activities & has nothing else on his record since he got out. Oklahoma County District Attorneys should be prosecuted for that long for the criminal acts they do. But they let each other get away with shit instead. I used to not feel this way but government is really a joke that prosicutes the poor & keeps them poor while they climb in power
DeleteA few months before Richard's arrest the Oklahoma City police force swerved in front of me & Richard as we were walking. They were 4 police cars deep & all in front of us in seconds. We did not even see them coming.
DeleteWe were stopped right there & told to put our hands up, which we did. I was pulled into a police car & told they just wanted to speak to him & that was it. The officer spent just a minute asking my info & said i could go as soon as it came back i had no warrents. Just as it began to come back & the officer was going to release me., supposedly an officer found a bag of drugs down the road a good distance when we were not even stopped that far back.
They told me that they were taking him for possession regardless & if I said it was his & that i seen him with it, then they would release me. Otherwise they taking me in for possession also.
They didn't say in those exact words but yet they did. They wanted to know if they were mine or his, but they said that they were taking him in on it regardless & if I said they weren't mine then they would let me go. But to say they were not mine was by also saying they were his & I knew this. That I had seen him with them & he threw them done.
But I had not seen him to have any drugs all day & i could not lie on something that i had not seen myself. So when they kept asking me about him & drugs, if I had seen him with any all day, or if I had seen him do any, then I told them what I knew. . But I also had not seen him with any drugs & knew for a fact he had none because he was asking some girl to share hers once during that day.
Because I was not saying the drugs were not mine by saying that I seen him with them & he had them.., then I ended up going to jail for possession also.
Crazy thing was that just as morning hit, about 8am, the jail personal came to release me. When we were exiting the pod she told me that they decided not to file charges on me. I was released but not him. He was held for 10 days like i should have been because its odd for them to pull you first thing in morning to release you because they decided not to file. And how & why does a jail officer even have that info in order to share it & even the one who took him to his arraignment.. ?
Richard waited out his 10 days but once he is released he tells me that the jail officer who took him to arraignment actually told him, while they were standing there for arraignment, that they decided to let me go..
Later on I had realized that basically they had tried to get me to set him up & would of used me saying it was his to have their proof. That's why they made me believe that otherwise I was going to have a case on me & I believed them at that time. I was scared to death & crying as I went to jail.
RICHARD URRUTIA case # 2018-4243
This time was illegal as well that they even searched his pockets. They had no probable cause although they tried to say it off a stolen truck that the officer never even seen him in. Nothing pointed to it either & they first gave him stolen car charge but it was dismissed over fact that nothing said he was even driving it.
At first they charged him with Trafficking all because it weighed 23 grams with the container. Even though there were not one single thing as far as scales, or baggies, or anything besides it being a personal bag.
ReplyDelete(Under the federal sentencing guidelines, a "drug trafficking offense" as "an offense under federal, state, or local law that prohibits the manufacture, import, export, distribution, or dispensing of a controlled substance or the possession of a controlled substance with intent to manufacture, import, export, distribute, or dispense." U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1),)
He was not transporting, or on a highway traveling. He was not making a sale & it was not hidden in a vehicle or animate object for concealing it. It was in his pocket & he was shopping at a store.
(The federal government typically treats trafficking as trafficking, and possession as possession no matter what the amount, but they do give a little leeway for each state to come up with their own guidelines. Although the definition of trafficking is commercial dealing or over state lines.)
So Oklahoma says that over 20 grams can be considered trafficking. But while in jail on a trafficking charge for having 23 grams of Meth in a single bag, he had 2 cell mates who were locked up for possession charges of a misdemeaner with one man carrying 25 grams of meth & he also had a few ounces of Herion with scales & bags.
(Prison reformers seem most unhappy about what they say is a trend of upgrading charges against nonviolent offenders. With our loose definitions many can find a way around question 780. The report notes that while admissions with a controlling drug offense declined, charges for possession with intent to distribute, drug trafficking,)
He had recently been released from prison so I was thinking that meant he had been clean. It was odd to me that he smoked as much as he did. But then I learnt it is widely common in prison & he was released having a habit like that. Guess it is more common to pick up that habit in prison than it is on the outs! And from what i understand its even easier to come across & more widely used.
What else is there to do to pass a prison sentence of solitude by than with drugs.. ?
(So, with history indicating that the challenges leading a person to prison – such as drug addition, alcoholism, untreated mental illnesses, and a lack of employment opportunities – are actually made worse by incarceration, prison time contributes not only to further financial desperation, but also a loss of family and social ties.)
At that court date (Dec. 10th, 2018) they stated they were gonna lower that charge of Trafficking to a possession charge. BUT HIS OFFER WAS 15 YEARS IN PRISON & THEY MAKING IT A FELONY CHARGE BECAUSE HE HAD A PRIOR POSSESSION CHARGE 7 YEARS AGO.
When I went over arrests each day in the jail blotter, all it shows is that there is in increase in possession with intent & also trafficking charges, since the new laws went out.
So what are the new guidelines for Trafficking & shouldn't they change the term to classify those who really do traffick in illegal drugs, or are they now lowering that charge & making trafficking drugs seem like possession now.???
DeleteIs the new drug reform going to work or is it just finding ways for people to be charged with higher crimes in order to bypass question 780? Seems to me now that more people are just charged with bigger offences than would have previously been so that the law can lock them up the same.